Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The ROC curves in Figure 2 compare the true positive rate of the four methods as a function of the false positive rate at different prediction thresholds.
Similar(59)
Figure 2 illustrates the computation time for the two methods as a function of the number of boundary discretization elements.
In Fig. 1 we show AREs in estimating standard deviation for the three methods as a function of sample size under simulated data from the selected five distributions.
In Figure 2, we show the size of the overlap between the two methods as a function of the iteration of co-training.
Figure 3 shows the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of the four compared methods as a function of the different types of mutations that we investigated.
Also, the average stage design strength ratio as obtained from the three design methods as a function of stage period is shown in Fig. 5.
(B, C) Morphology of NWs for two pre-treatment methods as a function of the radial distance from the center.
We therefore sought to analyze the performance of the three mutation analysis methods as a function of histopathologically estimated tumor-cell content.
Figure 6 shows the MCC of the compared methods as a function of four categories of ASA.
(d) Percentage of Trac-looping predicted interactions confirmed by alternative methods as a function of distance in resting CD4+ T cells.
Two different sizes of training sets 5 and 10 parallel sentences were used to demonstrate the performance of the examined methods as a function of training set size.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com