Sentence examples for foundation in which from inspiring English sources

In what spare time he has -- Harrison serves as a chairman at his former company and has established a $45 million charitable foundation in which he is actively involved -- he enjoys reading works of military and economic history.

Those who have never worn a pair of tights will get more out of a 112-minute videotaped session, produced by the foundation, in which the ballerina Maria Tallchief coaches the Sanguinic duet.

She wrote a blogpost in 2009 for the foundation in which she derided a proposed cap-and-trade system, a market-based approach to reducing pollution by providing incentives to reduce emissions.

They notably point to a 1969 exchange of letters with Harry Guggenheim, then president of the foundation, in which he accepted her strict conditions that the collection should be "kept as a whole and at the palazzo", without additions.

The size of the bond points to the millions of euros that – via a foundation in which the princess served as a board member – the two men allegedly obtained from fraudulent deals with politicians keen to bathe in the reflected glory of royalty.

They notably point to a 1969 exchange of letters with her cousin Harry Guggenheim, then president of the foundation, in which he accepted her strict conditions that the collection should be "kept as a whole and at the palazzo", without additions.

For the wealthy, philanthropy experts stress the tax advantages of donor-advised funds over private charitable foundations, in which deductions are capped at a lower rate.

Overseas administration, however, is turned over to educational foundations in which signatory governments and their academic communities participate; some other governments share the program's costs with the United States.

In this process, we put forward a number of tasks that need to be accomplished in order to move OM PCR forward and develop more solid conceptual foundations in which to anchor rigorous research in this area.

Thirdly, if it is not facts out there that settle what is true how can the Mādhyamika avoid the unacceptable relativistic conclusion that we cannot criticize epistemic or ethical practices which differ from ours? Fourthly, how can we make sense of an ontology without foundations in which there are no substantially existent objects on which everything else depends?

Jensen (1969) showed that NFU, the version of New Foundations in which extensionality is weakened to allow many non-sets (as described above under naive set theory) is consistent, is consistent with Infinity and Choice, and is also consistent with the negation of Infinity (which of course implies Choice).