These results broadly mirror what we find with performance on the dance test on day 5; participants performed better, judged they could reproduce better, and liked more movements for which they physically and/or audiovisually trained.
A correlation was found with cognitive performance in memory tests assessing verbal, visual, and semantic memory.
When severity of alcohol dependence was used as between participant factors, no significant differences were found with Stroop performance between high and low alcohol severity groups.
A significant main effect of task, F1,10 = 6.417, P = 0.030, was found, with lower performance in exact addition than approximate addition.
Professionals' system use was associated with expected ease of use and time availability, professionals' affiliation and the number of represented patients, while no association was found with expected performance of the system.
Latency (TD, 20.2 ± 2.2 ms; ND, 20.1 ± 1.6 ms) and SP durations (TD, 70 ± 29 ms, ND, 77 ± 30 ms) did not differ between task conditions, and no interaction was found with discrimination performance (F1,14 < 1, p > 0.1).
The expected differential adaptation patterns from DANCE versus MEMORY were confirmed in the results of the Executive Control Task, which reflects working memory as another dimension of the executive functions: different time courses of adaptation from pretest, to 3-months, and 6-months tests for DANCE versus MEMORY were found, with superior performance in DANCE after 6-months training.
Only marginal improvements were found with participants' navigational performance in terms of their deviation accuracies from a pre-programmed expert search path.
This is in line with earlier unpublished research (Howard & Best, 1996) where a significant group effect was also found with preferential naming performance for highly typical items.
