Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
Using this approach, transcripts with coding potential (CNCI <0), those with plastid homology (nine transcripts), and mitochondrial genomes (not found) were excluded.
Pictures where a significant difference was found were excluded from the analyses (less then 10%).
Patients with gout for whom no matched controls could be found were excluded from the study.
In addition, interventions for which only one study was found were excluded from pooled analyses.
Exposed individuals for whom no suitable unexposed match could be found were excluded from the analysis.
Spots flagged bad or not found were excluded from further analysis.
Similar(45)
If no statistically significant differences were found, variables were excluded.
Candidate studies (4864) were found; 3844 were excluded after review of the abstract.
Three more potentially suitable trials were found but were excluded [15, 16, 17].
Values of not found features were excluded from further analysis.
Only a negligible number of medical records could not be found or were excluded due to insufficient information.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com