Similar(60)
I found the choice of instrument revealing.
When conducting consistency analysis for each risk factor/design dyad, we found the % of studies with positive finding, given hypothesis, for most outcomes and study participants to range from ~38.9% for caffeine (27.3 for cohort studies (n = 11), 57.1% for cross-sectional studies(n = 7)) to ~89% for physical activity 87.5% for cohort studies(n = 24); 100% for cross-sectional studies(n = 4)).
Find the number of allowances.
Find the bowl of tomatoes.
Find the explanation of interest.
Find the direction of opening.
Find the line of intuition.
Find the lines of opposition.
Find the line of Fate.
Find the price of food.
Find the number of gallons.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com