foster for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "foster for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear what you intend to express with "foster for," as "foster" typically requires a direct object without the preposition "for." Example: "We aim to foster collaboration among team members."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

Beloved husband of Pamela (Foster) for 35 years.

The New York Times

"It's like blaming Jodie Foster for the individual who shot Ronald Reagan".

The New York Times

split that the Kremlin has been hoping for and trying to foster for years.

The New Yorker

Foster for adopt must not become associated with a headlong rush into adoption.

The Guardian

But the meeting truly was about adoption: we sought a foster for Eric.

The New Yorker

Thomas then completed a 19-yard pass to Foster for the first down.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

(5) To Nora Foster, for more than 30 years.

The Guardian

Messrs. Adolph L. Pincoffs and Roger Foster for appellee.

Cornell University

Doctor Foster, for example, sinks into a puddle, never to visit Gloucester again.

The New York Times - Books

Dancing Brick and Lucy Foster, for making us laugh and trying to save the planet.

The Guardian

Mrs Constance Winifred Foster, for serv the community in the London borough of Barking and Dagenham.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When intending to convey encouragement or promotion, replace "foster for" with a more grammatically sound alternative like "encourage", "promote", or rephrase to use "foster" with a direct object (e.g., "foster collaboration").

Common error

Avoid using "foster for" to link fostering to a benefit or purpose. The verb 'foster' typically takes a direct object (e.g., "foster growth", "foster creativity"). If you are trying to convey the meaning of creating a better condition to achieve something, restructure the sentence to reflect that with correct grammar.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "foster for" does not have a standard grammatical function in English. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase sounds incorrect. If 'foster' is intended to mean promote or encourage, it typically requires a direct object without 'for'.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

33%

Wiki

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

2%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "foster for" appears with moderate frequency across various sources, including news and media, science, and wikis. However, according to Ludwig AI, it is considered grammatically incorrect, since the verb "foster" usually requires a direct object without the preposition "for". To ensure clarity and grammatical correctness, it is recommended to replace "foster for" with more suitable alternatives like "encourage", "promote", or restructure sentences to properly utilize "foster" with a direct object.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

encourage

Implies inspiring with confidence; differs in directness and focus.

promote

Suggests advancing or raising something; differs in formality.

nurture

Focuses on caring and developing; it's less about direct advancement.

cultivate

Implies careful and sustained development; relates more to long-term growth.

develop

Suggests a gradual unfolding or expansion; less about immediate action.

support

Offers assistance or advocacy; less about direct causation.

stimulate

Means to encourage activity or growth; differs in intensity.

advance

Implies moving something forward; more direct and less about underlying growth.

facilitate

Means to make an action easier; relates more to indirect assistance.

encourage to

Suggests giving someone the confidence to do something; differs by including a specific action.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "foster for" in my writing?

Replace "foster for" with stronger alternatives like "encourage", "promote", or restructure your sentence so "foster" directly acts upon an object. For example, instead of "foster for growth", write "foster growth".

What are some alternatives to "foster for" that maintain a similar meaning?

Depending on the context, you might use phrases such as "promote", "encourage", or "nurture". Each emphasizes a slightly different aspect of growth or development.

Is "foster for" ever grammatically correct?

No, "foster for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The verb "foster" typically takes a direct object, without the need for "for". To express the intended meaning, rephrase the sentence.

What's the difference between using "foster" and "foster for"?

The phrase "foster for" is not standard English. "Foster" should be used with a direct object, such as "foster innovation" or "foster development". Avoid using "foster for" as it does not conform to grammatical norms.