Sentence examples for formulation shown in from inspiring English sources

Attractive areas' effects are simulated according to the formulation shown in Eq. (4) with β=−α.

To circumvent this problem, we can use a piece-wise linear approximation to obtain the formulation shown in (11), which is suitable for mixed-integer linear programming (MILP).

Our dynamic formulation, shown in the previous section, makes use of logic-based ODEs.

The optimized formulation, shown in Table 2, had the minimum particle size and maximum entrapment efficiency.

The sentence-based segmentation model followed the formulation shown in Table 1 and classified sections in two steps.

Effect sizes for overall, combined dose levels for each formulation, shown in Figure  2, were greatest for Equasym XL® at 3 hours post-dose (SKAMP-Attention 0.72 versus 0.48 for Concerta®; SKAMP-Deportment 0.89 versus 0.50 for Concerta®).

The preparation process for CA-cellulose viscopearl membranes was carried out by mixing the matrix components according to the formulations shown in Table 1.

We repeated the same experiments, this time using the nanoparticle formulations shown in Figure 2 B, where siRNA dose remained constant at 20 nM and 1 1 R647 concentration was varied from 11.25 to 360 μg/mL.

Nanoparticle properties were measured using the same formulations shown in Figure 2 A, in which siRNA dose was varied from 1 to 160 nM and 1 1 R647 concentration remained the same at 180 μg/mL.

Drug entrapment efficiency of the formulations shows in F1 (D C A = 2 5 30) was approximately 70% whereas the increase in chitosan concentration in F2 (D C A = 2 10 30) has shown an entrapment efficiency of 81%.

Monthly costs for each drug formulation are shown in Table  3 for each WHO weight band where that drug formulation is recommended.