This paper presents a new risk aversion p-hub center problem with fuzzy travel times, in which value-at-risk (VaR) criterion is adopted in the formulation of objection function.
Consider Kitcher's formulation of this objection.
The most straightforward formulation of the objection is as follows.
The formulation of the objection is that of Śāntarakṣita in Tattvasaṃgraha 396: athāpi santi nityasya kramiṇaḥ sahakāriṇaḥ /yān apekṣya karoty eṣa kāryagrāmaṇ kramāśrayam //.
(See Hellman 2003 for a standard formulation of the objection, McLarty 1993, Awodey 2004, Landry & Marquis 2005, Shapiro 2005, Landry 2011, Linnebo & Pettigrew 2011, McLarty 2011 for relevant material on the issue).
Schlesinger (1994, 84) canvasses a sharpened formulation of this objection: an appeal to greedy, self-interested motivations is incompatible with "the quest for piety" that is essential to religion.
See Bays 2001 for Bays' original formulation of this objection; see Velleman 1998 and Gaifman 2004 for some alternate formulations; see Bellotti 2005 and Bays 2007b for critical discussion; and see chapter 3 (esp. § 3.3.3) of Hafner 2005 for discussion of a similar point concerning Putnam's use of transitivity.
That is, the 'only' part argued against in the above formulation of Maddy's objection is unnecessary.
Apart from the difficulties that must be handled by particular formulations of theological voluntarism, there are a number of objections that have been levelled against theological voluntarist views as such.
There can be no objection to [the formulation of the rule], provided the authority is always willing to listen to anyone with something new to say".
§ 458.83 Waiver of objections.
