Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(34)
The following formula is valid [18, 19].
Assuming that the formula is valid for, we get (B21).
The challenger of such a claim is thus committed to defend that the formula is valid.
The formula is valid for arbitrary crystallographic textures and isotropic two-point statistics.
We note that this formula is valid if (sigma _{0}<C_{N_{w}}phantom {dot {i}!}).
This formula is valid in a time-averaged sense for ω > 0.
Similar(26)
However, this empirical formula was valid only for water-Al2O3 nanofluid.
Those who wish to retain (2) may be consoled by the following observation: though substitutivity salve veritate of co-extensive open formulas fails for nearly all free logics, a related but weaker principle, the substitutivity salve veritate of co-comprehensive open formulas, is valid for positive free logics.
These formulae are valid unless e>0.2.
Their formulae are valid in the early stage of planet formation.
These explicit formulas are valid for most practical problems, thus providing a useful reference for engineering applications.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com