Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In Figure 3, we represent the result obtained by using the Euclidean distance measure in the k-means algorithm (we measure the accuracy of the cluster by using the formula, accuracy = (number of data points in the right cluster/total number of data points)).
Similar(59)
To evaluate the performance of the algorithm, specificity (SP), sensitivity (SN), accuracy (ACC) and MCC were computed as per the following formulas: Accuracy given by MCC given by where TP is true positives; TN is true negatives; FP is false positives; FN is false negatives.
The odds of all 108 16-seeds losing, as in fact they have, were a mere 6%.The outperformance of high seeds relative to quantitative expectations has led to some speculation that the log5 formula loses accuracy when forecasting the results of extremely mismatched teams.
The formula's accuracy of predicting multilayer's residual stress through its monolayers was also investigated.
After the description of the existing test data to calibrate the DSM-based formula, the accuracy of the analytical expressions given in Eurocode 3 [1] and the North-American Specification [2] is briefly assessed.
The formula for accuracy is (TP+TN / TP+TN+FP+FN).
The prediction formula for accuracy of case control studies (rgĝ) is not a simple function of λ and the observed <img src="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=info?doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0003395.e071.PNG" class= inline-graphic"/>, but also depends on both the heritability on the liability scale and the disease prevalence, as seen from Equation (8).
Moreover, this formula loses accuracy when the GFR is > 60 ml min-1 1.73 m-1 and/or if the serum creatinine concentration is not calibrated to MDRD laboratory creatinine values [ 37].
Therefore, the situation where the first order trajectory sensitivity formulas analysis accuracy of some parameters is not high is improved.
In this study, the authors examined the following 5 formulae for accuracy of prediction: 0.11×BH+10.53 (cm) from Brodsky et al1; 0.15×BH+3.96 (cm) from Bahk and Oh2; 0.148×BH+3.8 (cm) from Chow et al;3 0.1×BH+12.5 (cm) from Takita et al4; and 0.1977×BH – 4.2423 (cm) (authors' formula).
In fact the deterministic formula for GEBV accuracy predicts quite well the GEBV accuracies we achieve in the Jersey population given the Ne, number of records used and heritability [ 14, 22].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com