Some are factual, but the general counterfactual idiom conditionals allows for the formation of sentences which are not factual.
But in that case it seems that he needs some other way to constrain the formation of T-sentences so as to ensure that they do indeed deliver correct specifications of what sentences mean.
In fact, it's as though there is no actual "technique" of defamiliarization at work in his prose at all; he reveals the intrinsic strangeness of things (and people) without the need for any particular cunning in the formation of his sentences.
Satisfaction of the requirement that a theory of meaning be adequate as an empirical theory, and so that it be adequate to the actual behaviour of speakers, will also ensure tighter constraints (if such are needed) on the formation of T-sentences.
The delivery of interpretation should be professional and the formation of the sentences has to be simple and accurate.
We see from (5.4 bis) that the reason why the generalized completeness theorem fails for Σ1-sets in L ω1,ω) is that, roughly speaking, H ω1) is not "closed" under the formation of deductions from Σ1-sets of sentences in H ω1).
In an English-language class, Mohammad Bakhtiari stood in front of his pupils and discussed the architecture of the language: sentence structure, the formation of paragraphs, the conjugation of verbs.
With the two basic categories of sentence and name, every category and expression, no matter how complex, will have a categorial index beginning either with 'so, so ultimately leading to the formation of a sentence, or 'N', so ultimately leading to the formation of a name.
Here, we investigated how the semantic relatedness of sentence constituents influences sentence processing.
