Login and get your AI feedback from Ludwig. Login and get your AI feedback from Ludwig.
Login and get your AI feedback from Ludwig.
In different composite films the formal potential (E0′) of GOD is different.
An excellent linear relationship between the formal potential and solvent's acceptor number was found.
The formal potential of the Sn II)/Sn is −0.57 V vs. Ag/Ag(I).
The formal potential of AQDS and the reduction potential of dioxygen both exhibit pH dependence.
The formal potential of the attached electroactive species was E0 = 175 mV vs. sce.
Our study indicates that the formal potential is influenced with shifts of up to 100 mV.
The formal potential (E0′) of the adsorbed PDA was −140 mV vs. SCE (saturated calomel electrode).
The formal potential of 0.63 V for the formation of OMn(IV)(4-TMPyP) has been estimated from OTTLE data.
Its formal potential is −0.330 V (vs. saturated calomel electrode) in pH 7.0 phosphate buffer solution (PBS).
The formal potential difference between mixed SAMs immobilization and complementary ssDNA hybridization was measured in different ionic strength concentrations.
The oxidation process of Biliverdin was also studied and the formal potential E0′ = 0.637 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) was obtained.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com