Sentence examples for formal consequences from inspiring English sources

Gaveau, B. & Schulman, L. A general framework for non-equilibrium phenomena: The master equation and its formal consequences.

Prose here stands for the regular drift of thought unmonitored by the high calculation of poetic form; this is a rare concession for Phillips, and one that he makes only for its formal consequences.

These two approaches are not only intensionally divergent; they also disagree on the extension of the class of formal consequences.

Thus, according to Ockham, formal consequences are those that hold in virtue of middles, be they intrinsic or extrinsic.

It is mostly thanks to the method of Berndtsson from [5] that they are in fact formal consequences of (1.3) and one does not have to repeat Hörmander's arguments.

The epistemic/psychological interpretation of these formulations of formal consequences has not gone uncontested; arguably, they are equally compatible with a semantic interpretation emphasizing the signification of sentences (Read 2010, 178).

A syllogistic consequence is a formal consequence whose antecedent is a conjunction of two quantified propositions and whose consequent is a third quantified proposition.

To mark this distinction, 14th century British authors would typically view the former as a material consequence and the latter as a formal consequence (Ashworth & Spade 1992).

The Relativist agrees with the Demarcater that logical consequence must be understood as formal consequence, and so presupposes a distinction between logical and nonlogical constants.

Both were ideas that had been floating around for centuries, but which yield very different conceptions of what counts as a formal consequence.

But it is clear that, while the Parisian tradition defined the concept of formal consequence in terms of (ST), the British tradition formulated the same concept in terms of (Co).