Sentence examples for form equivalence from inspiring English sources
The results of this synthesis demonstrate that while most individuals with ASD are able to form equivalence classes, the findings are variable.
Three alternate forms of the SCIP are available, with good reliability, validity, and form equivalence [ 18].
The alternate form equivalence was measured by means of a multivariate and univariate analysis of variance of baseline subtest and total scores, respectively.
The reliability of the SCIP was assessed by examination of alternate form equivalence, the test-retest reliability, the internal consistency within the bipolar sample, and the magnitude of practice effects observed with alternate forms.
Thus, while there may be cognitive deficits associated with ALS, such as slowness in acquiring new conditional associations, it should be reemphasized that the patient did form equivalence classes of the stimuli, as healthy human subjects ordinarily do.
Once a relation is acquired, and once relations form equivalence classes during training, then responding correctly during equivalence testing may, loosely speaking, be a matter of long-term memory [ 26, 27], for which the patient showed no deficit.
These parallelisms then form equivalences with the five directions, and they in turn with the five primary colours.
When tested for symmetry, transitivity, and equivalence, the patient scored at or above 90% indicating that A → B and B → C training had formed equivalence classes of the trained stimuli.
On the other hand, Græmlin correctly forms equivalence classes for the three vertex-similar vertices, as revealed by perfect performance according to the relaxed rule; however, it does not decide between the paralogous vertices as in the equivalence classes all three vertices are always present, Figure 5 ii).
We also study compactability properties for a weaker form of equivalence, called query equivalence, which allows to introduce new propositional symbols.
For the next two sessions, the percent correct was 98.3 for both Test 1 and Test 2. That the overall correct selection was very close to 100% on all four sessions indicates that the patient easily identified and selected the group of stimuli that formed an equivalence class.
