As can be seen in Fig. 2, consistently recalled items exhibited a higher degree of output-bound accuracy than either forgotten (t [64] = 4.50, p < .001) or reminisced (t [67] = 5.69, p < .001) items.
As can be seen in Fig. 2, consistent items exhibited a higher degree of output-bound accuracy than either forgotten (t [136] = 7.29, p < .001) or reminisced (t [139] = 7.41, p < .001) items.
Or Kelsea's "Gone but not Forgotten" T-shirt made in a high school graphics class.
In Tasmania's 183-run win over Queensland at Bellerive Oval, there were first-innings runs for the resurgent Ed Cowan (93) and wickets to Ben Cutting (4-54) but Joe Burns (90) was the only leading light in Queensland's dismal reply, which featured a hat-trick from forgotten Test paceman Ben Hilfenhaus.
"I forgot my T-shirt," I said weakly, trying to make a joke.
Consistently recalled items exhibited a higher degree of output-bound accuracy than forgotten items (t [201] = 8.54, p < .001).001
In general, the forgetting period T f is fixed, therefore there is only one free parameter controlling the filtering, e.g., the forgetting factor C f, which we assign according to the dynamic network, i.e., the faster the network densifies in time, the more aggressive forgetting we use (see Appendix B for more details about the values of parameters).
Therefore, we define two factors, η1 t) and η2 t), to determine the forgetting factor β t at time t: β t = k η 1 ( t ) η 2 ( t ) (38).
Forget the T-shirts and sandals, not to mention the techie arrogance.
"Never forget" the T-shirts and bumper stickers declared after 9/11, and no American — let alone New Yorker — ever will.
