forfeiture of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "forfeiture of" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal or formal contexts to refer to the loss of rights, property, or privileges as a penalty for wrongdoing or failure to meet obligations. Example: "The contract included a clause that stipulated the forfeiture of the deposit if the terms were not met."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

risks forfeiture of E-ZPass privileges.

The New York Times

The government is seeking forfeiture of $222,798.

The New York Times

Other punishments include forfeiture of all property and various fines.

The Guardian

Forfeiture of assets is most often used in racketeering cases.

The Guardian

The court also ordered the forfeiture of his sign.

The Guardian - Opinion

Prosecutors also recommended a reduction of rank, forfeiture of pay, dishonorable discharge and a fine.

The New York Times

But it concluded the strict rules surrounding the forfeiture of honours prevented it from acting.

Independent

His sentence was a reduction in rank and forfeiture of $500 in pay.

The New York Times

Possible sanctions include suspensions for players and coaches, fines and the forfeiture of draft picks.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

Prosecutors are seeking forfeiture of $45 million from them.

The New York Times

The indictment seeks the forfeiture of $1 million in total from the defendants.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "forfeiture of", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being lost and the reason behind the loss. This phrase is most effective in legal, formal, or serious contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "forfeiture of" in informal settings or when describing everyday losses. Using "loss of" or "giving up" may be more appropriate in less formal scenarios.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "forfeiture of" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It denotes the act or instance of losing something as a penalty or consequence, commonly in legal and formal contexts. Ludwig confirms its correct and usable nature.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Academia

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "forfeiture of" is a noun phrase denoting the loss of something as a penalty, predominantly used in formal contexts like law, business, and news reporting. It is grammatically sound and frequently encountered, as confirmed by Ludwig. While alternatives like "loss of" or "relinquishment of" exist for less formal scenarios, "forfeiture of" maintains its significance when precision and formality are paramount. Its usage patterns reveal a strong presence in news, legal, and business contexts, highlighting its role in conveying serious consequences. Therefore, understanding its precise meaning and appropriate context is crucial for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

loss of

A more general term indicating something is gone or no longer possessed, not necessarily as a penalty.

relinquishment of

Focuses on the act of voluntarily giving something up.

deprivation of

Highlights the act of being denied something, often a right or privilege.

surrender of

Implies giving up something, often rights or control, to an opponent or authority.

confiscation of

Suggests taking property by authority, often due to a violation of rules or laws.

seizure of

Indicates that something has been taken forcefully, usually by legal authority.

revocation of

Specifically refers to the cancellation or annulment of a privilege or right.

expropriation of

Implies the government taking private property for public use, often with compensation.

lapsing of

Highlights that something has expired or become invalid due to neglect or inaction.

waiver of

Indicates a voluntary renunciation of a known right or claim.

FAQs

How is "forfeiture of" typically used in legal contexts?

In legal settings, "forfeiture of" often refers to the loss of property or rights as a penalty for illegal activities or failure to comply with contractual obligations. It is a formal term that carries significant legal weight.

What are some alternatives to "forfeiture of" that I can use in less formal writing?

In less formal contexts, you can use alternatives like "loss of", "giving up", or "relinquishing depending on the specific nuance you want to convey".

Is there a difference between "forfeiture of" and "seizure of"?

"Forfeiture of" generally implies a loss due to a failure or wrongdoing, while "seizure of" suggests a forced taking, often by legal authority. The key difference lies in whether the loss is a consequence of an action or an external imposition.

Can "forfeiture of" apply to abstract concepts like honor or reputation?

While primarily used for tangible assets or legal rights, "forfeiture of" can metaphorically apply to abstract concepts. For example, one might speak of the "forfeiture of" someone's reputation due to scandal, although alternatives like "loss of" or "damage to might be more fitting".