Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
The foregoing argument implies that traditional FTF interviewing is unsuitable for collecting potentially sensitive data and calls for alternative methods of interviewing that increase privacy and are less confrontational.
The foregoing argument, then, has served to clear up the point about which we raised a difficulty at the outset-why is it that instead of all things being either in motion or at rest, or some things being always in motion and the remainder always at rest, there are things that are sometimes in motion and sometimes not?
The foregoing argument makes essential use of collapse.
The foregoing argument incorporates deontological and consequentialist considerations.
Rupert (2001) has a lengthy reply to the foregoing argument.
Graham Oppy (2003) suggests a way to defeat the foregoing argument.
Similar(45)
If we assume that there exists a subsequence with as well being closed in, then noting that is a Cauchy sequence in, foregoing arguments establish (IV) and (V).
If we assume that there exists a subsequence { S x 2 n k + 1 } ⊆ Q 0 with TC as well as SC closed in X, then noting that { S x 2 n k + 1 } is a Cauchy sequence in SC, foregoing arguments establish (IV) and (V).
If we assume that there exists a subsequence { S x 2 n k + 1 } ⊆ Q 0 with TC as well SC are closed in X, then noting that { S x 2 n k + 1 } is a Cauchy sequence in SC, the foregoing arguments establish (IV) and (V).
It is clear, then, from the foregoing arguments that locomotion is the primary motion.
The foregoing arguments show that it cannot be an atom; but neither can it be a divisible body which analysis will never reach.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com