forces with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "forces with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is likely intended to convey collaboration or partnership, but the phrase is incomplete and does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "The organization forces with local communities to address environmental issues." (This should be corrected to "The organization collaborates with local communities...")

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Here he could join forces with General Abubakar.

The Economist

They've also joined forces with their newspapers.

The New Yorker

"We are thrilled to join forces with On Assignment.

The New York Times

Retreating, Warwick joined forces with York's son Edward.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In 1789 he joined forces with J.-F.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"I don't want to join forces with them.

The New York Times - Sports

They have combined forces with nonlabor groups like MoveOn.org.

The New York Times

Barry presents the contending forces with gathering momentum.

The New York Times - Books

Now this Haitian-American joins forces with musicians from Senegal.

The New York Times

A cabdriver joins forces with a neofascist militia.

The New York Times - Books

Fighters from Islamic militias are also joining forces with Isis.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "forces with" in formal writing. Instead, choose more grammatically correct and precise alternatives like "collaborates with" or "partners with" to clearly convey the intended meaning.

Common error

Ensure you complete the phrase with a verb that clearly indicates the type of interaction. Using "forces with" without a proper verb creates ambiguity and grammatical errors. Choose action verbs such as: partner, align, collaborate etc.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "forces with" functions as an incomplete phrase needing a verb to convey a complete meaning. Based on the context of examples shown by Ludwig, it's often intended to suggest collaboration, opposition, or influence. The phrase on its own lacks grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

14%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

6%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "forces with" appears frequently across diverse sources, including news media and scientific publications, it's grammatically incorrect as pointed out by Ludwig AI. It requires a verb to be complete. To express collaboration, consider alternatives like "collaborate with" or "partner with". Always aim for grammatical precision, especially in formal writing, to ensure clarity and credibility. While "forces with" might be understood in informal contexts, it's best avoided in professional settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

collaborate with

Suggests a cooperative effort towards a common goal; focuses on mutual contribution.

partner with

Implies a formal agreement to work together, often for mutual benefit.

join efforts with

Highlights the act of combining resources and energy for a shared purpose.

team up with

Suggests a less formal collaboration, often in a sporting or competitive context.

align with

Implies agreement or support for a particular cause or ideology.

contend with

Focuses on struggling against opposing elements.

grapple with

Highlights struggling against difficulties or intricate problems.

struggle against

Implies a determined effort to overcome something challenging or resistant.

influenced by

Indicates the impact or effect that something has on someone or something else.

impacted by

Suggests a notable and direct consequence or influence, often negative.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "forces with"?

Depending on the context, consider using "collaborate with", "partner with", or "join efforts with" to express collaboration. If you intend to convey influence, use "influenced by".

Is "forces with" grammatically correct?

No, "forces with" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It is an incomplete phrase that requires a verb to express a complete thought. Ludwig AI explains that this phrase is incorrect and needs to be replaced with a valid alternative.

How can I use "forces with" in a sentence correctly?

You can't use "forces with" directly. Instead, rephrase your sentence to include a verb that clarifies the relationship, such as "collaborates with" or "joins forces with".

What's the difference between "forces with" and "joins forces with"?

"Forces with" is an incomplete and grammatically incorrect phrase. "Joins forces with", on the other hand, is a complete and correct phrase that means to unite or collaborate with someone.