Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

for why

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'for why' is not correct English.
The correct phrase is 'why' or 'for what reason'. Example: I asked him why he was talking so loudly, but he couldn't give me an answer.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

For why? JS: Why?

And for why he was wrong.

News & Media

The New York Times

I was looking for why.

News & Media

The New York Times

Everyone has their own explanation for why.

News & Media

The Guardian

"We need to account for why".

News & Media

The New York Times

No explanation for why he did this".

News & Media

The Guardian

And Ms. Makarova offers a spirited argument for why not.

He makes my case for why we need change".

News & Media

The New York Times

This is the secret for why Berlin is still alive".

News & Media

The New Yorker

I have no words for why this happened.

News & Media

The New York Times

As for why, the answer is simple: powder.

News & Media

Independent
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "for why" in formal writing. Instead, opt for grammatically correct alternatives such as "why" or "for what reason" to maintain clarity and professionalism.

Common error

Do not begin sentences with "for why" in formal or academic contexts. This structure is not standard English and can detract from your writing's credibility. Using "why" directly is more concise and correct.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for why" functions as an interrogative phrase, attempting to inquire about the reason or cause of something. However, it's deemed grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI, with the recommendation to use "why" or "for what reason" instead. Despite its prevalence in certain contexts, its non-standard structure limits its utility in formal settings.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Academia

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "for why" appears frequently, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect in standard English. Its function is to ask for a reason or explanation, but it's more appropriate to use "why" or "for what reason", especially in formal writing. The phrase is most commonly found in news and media sources, but its informal nature makes it unsuitable for academic or professional settings. By using more grammatically correct alternatives, writers can ensure clarity and credibility in their communication.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "for why" in a sentence?

Replace "for why" with "why" or "for what reason". For example, instead of "For why did he leave?", use "Why did he leave?" or "For what reason did he leave?".

Is "for why" ever considered correct in English?

No, "for why" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. While it may appear in informal speech or certain dialects, it is best to avoid it in formal writing or professional communication.

What are some formal alternatives to "for why"?

Formal alternatives include "for what reason", "on what account", or rephrasing the sentence to use "why" directly. For example: "Why did this happen?".

Is there a difference in meaning between "for why" and "why"?

While the intended meaning is usually clear, "for why" is not grammatically correct. Using "why" is more concise, grammatically sound, and universally accepted in English.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: