Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

for whom recommendations

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for whom recommendations" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to refer to the recipients of recommendations, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "I need to know for whom recommendations are being made in this report."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Gay men, for whom recommendations suggest the HPV vaccine until age 28 – a time window two years longer than for straight men – may not be aware of the expanded vaccination criteria or may decline the vaccine altogether, erroneously assuming it applies only to heterosexuals.

Prevention speaks against tobacco abuse with a single voice, but in many other areas contradictory research findings have generated skepticism and even indifference among the general public for whom recommendations are targeted.

The recommendations were not evaluated for changes in treatment over this time period, only the number of patients for whom recommendations were available was evaluated.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Following the evaluation of the evidence, recommendations were developed in detail to facilitate interpretation by decision makers for whom the recommendations are intended.

I ask, "Painful for whom?" These recommendations ask those who have already been and are sacrificing to sacrifice further.

News & Media

Huffington Post

In regards to software changes between October 2002 and January 2004, each of the programs evaluated increased the number of patients for whom expert recommendations were available Table 3.

In the review arm 97% (60/62) of participants' records were reviewed (note there was one postrandomisation exclusion) for whom 197 recommendations were made.

Science

BMJ Open

Of the patients for whom treatment recommendations were changed, the most frequent change was from chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy to endocrine therapy alone (52 89 % of cases); however, a clinically relevant proportion of patients were identified as likely to derive a significant benefit from the addition of chemotherapy [ 15– 18, 20, 21, 23– 26].

Therefore, a study that is designed such that all subjects receive the same weight-based (mg/kg) dose regardless of age would be unlikely to succeed in younger patients, for whom alternative dose recommendations would have to be considered.

One potential advantage of treatment with neoadjuvant therapy is the opportunity to use pathologic response at the time of surgery to stratify patients by risk and subsequently select those for whom further therapeutic recommendations may be beneficial.

The proportion of patients for whom the CDSS recommendation was followed was 74 % (95 CI 65 82 %) in the Before OMA group and 75%% (95 CI 69 81 %) in the After OMA group.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing recommendations, ensure clarity by specifying the target audience directly, such as "recommendations for students" instead of using potentially ambiguous phrasing.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "for whom recommendations" directly; instead, rephrase to clearly indicate who the recommendations are intended for to prevent confusion and ensure grammatical correctness.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for whom recommendations" functions as a relative clause aiming to specify the recipients or the intended audience of particular recommendations. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is not grammatically correct and requires rephrasing for clarity.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for whom recommendations" seeks to specify the target of recommendations, but Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. It appears across scientific, news, and formal business contexts, albeit infrequently. To ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy, it’s best to rephrase using options like "recommendations for whom" or specifying the audience directly (e.g., "recommendations for students"). This approach ensures the intended meaning is conveyed effectively and professionally.

FAQs

What is a more grammatically correct way to ask "for whom recommendations are made"?

Instead of "for whom recommendations", consider asking "who are the recommendations for" or "for whom are these recommendations intended" for better clarity.

How can I rephrase "for whom recommendations" to be more specific?

To be more specific, you could say "recommendations for students", "recommendations for patients", or "recommendations for employees", depending on the intended audience.

Is it acceptable to use "for whom recommendations" in formal writing?

No, it is generally not acceptable in formal writing. The phrase is grammatically awkward. Use more direct phrasing such as "recommendations for whom" or rephrase for clarity.

What is a simple alternative to "for whom recommendations"?

A simpler alternative is to ask "who are these recommendations for" or "who should follow these recommendations" which is more direct and easier to understand.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: