Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
for whom information
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "for whom information" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to the recipient of information, but it lacks context and clarity. Example: "I need to clarify for whom information is being shared in this report."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Of the 79 patients for whom information was available, 68percentt had infections that might have been prevented through vaccination, Dr. Bruce said.
News & Media
Five of the 10 adults who died for whom information was available had not received the flu vaccine, the HPA said.
News & Media
Mediation analyses were performed in a subset of 87 participants for whom information was available on both PFASs and THs.
For the purpose of the analysis, attention is placed on women for whom information on migration is available.
Science
The analysis was based on a local case register and included all patients for whom information on lifetime sexual violence was available (N = 3531; 68.3% males).
Science
For the analysis, the sample was restricted to 2192 students who had participated in the follow-up and for whom information on educational attainment at upper secondary level was available.
The probability of being overeducated is analyzed using the whole sample while the ORU-regressions used for analyzing wage effects of overeducation are based on the sample of employees for whom information on monthly wages exists.
Science
Out of the 69 children with low birth weight for whom information on gestational age was available, 38 (55%) were classified as preterm newborns.
Science
Thirty-seven patients for whom information about age was available were children between 5 months and 9 years (mean age, 31.3 months; median age, 24 months).
Science
[17] Using their personal identification number, these children were then linked to their parents, siblings, grandparents, and mother's siblings, for whom information on the date and cause of death could be retrieved.
Science
Thirty-seven children withdrew and one died before any home visits took place, leaving 335 children for whom information on outcomes was available and who were included in the analysis (Figure 1).
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
For clarity and grammatical correctness, rephrase "for whom information" to specify the relationship between the information and the intended recipients or subjects. Use alternatives such as "regarding the individuals the information is for" or "concerning the people that the information relates to".
Common error
Do not use the phrase "for whom information" without clarifying the intended relationship. This phrase is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity, potentially confusing readers about the information's purpose or recipients.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "for whom information" often functions as a prepositional phrase aiming to specify the recipient or subject related to certain data or details. However, it is grammatically incomplete and requires further context to form a coherent clause. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase is often used to introduce a clause about individuals or entities about which information is available.
Frequent in
Science
89%
News & Media
8%
Formal & Business
1%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "for whom information" is frequently used to specify the subjects or recipients related to particular data. However, it is grammatically flawed and lacks clarity. While widely present in scientific and news contexts, as Ludwig AI illustrates, it should be rephrased for better grammatical accuracy and comprehensibility. Alternatives like "regarding the individuals the information is for" or "concerning the people that the information relates to" offer clearer and more precise expressions. Despite its common usage, relying on grammatically correct alternatives will enhance the overall quality and clarity of writing. Best practice recommends avoiding this phrase in favor of alternatives as it is considered Incorrect by Ludwig AI.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
regarding the individuals information is for
Rephrases to clarify that the information is intended for specific individuals, altering the structure for grammatical correctness.
about the individuals data is relevant for
Simplifies the phrase to directly state the relevance of the data for individuals, making it more straightforward.
regarding the persons details are intended for
Emphasizes the intended recipients of the details, specifying purpose.
concerning the people that information relates to
Changes the focus to the relationship between the information and the people it concerns, emphasizing relevance.
concerning those details are applicable to
Focuses on the applicability of the details to specific individuals, adding clarity.
in relation to the subjects information pertains to
Uses more formal language to indicate the subjects the information is relevant to, enhancing specificity.
pertaining to the recipients facts are directed at
Emphasizes the direction of the facts toward specific recipients, clarifying intent.
relative to the parties data concerns
Formally specifies the parties that the data is about, highlighting relevance.
with respect to those information is about
Clarifies the scope, focusing on individuals directly addressed by the information.
in terms of the persons facts are gathered for
Highlights the purpose of gathering facts for specific persons, emphasizing intent and use.
FAQs
How can I correctly use "for whom information" in a sentence?
The phrase "for whom information" is grammatically incorrect. Instead, clarify the relationship. For example, use "information for whom" or rephrase the sentence to clearly indicate the recipient or subject.
What are some alternatives to "for whom information"?
Consider alternatives like "regarding the individuals the information is for", "concerning the people that the information relates to", or "details intended "recipients of"" depending on the context.
Is "for whom information" grammatically correct?
No, "for whom information" is not grammatically correct. It lacks a clear verb and proper structure. Rephrasing is necessary to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy.
How to avoid ambiguity when referring to information and its recipients?
Avoid using vague phrases like "for whom information". Instead, clearly state the relationship between the information and its intended audience. Use phrases like "information intended for" or "details concerning "specific group"".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested