Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The large cohort of 2,324 patients represents a collection of previously published gene expression datasets, for which integral data on clinico-pathological factors are unavailable.
Similar(59)
In general one can define int nint_para different parameters initialized in void init_para int i, void *int_param) for which the integral is performed by calling the integration routine once.
The convolution of two locally Lebesgue integrable functions is defined by (1.2). for for which the integral exists.
Note that the support of k 1 and k 2 has a positive measure in any open interval having supremum h, so that the interval of integration is not artificially extended by concluding with an interval, for which the integral is automatically zero.
for all for which the integral exists.
The atoms considered in the pairs for which the integral of the RDF is taken are illustrated in the inset sketch.
and we want to find conditions on the weight functions u, v and on the functions a i, b i, for which the integral operator ( k f ) ( x ) : = ∫ 0 x k ( x, t ) f ( t ) d t (1.4).
Indeed, the following Hardy inequality guarantees its equivalence ( ∫ 0 ∞ ( t 1 p t ∫ 0 t f d τ ) q d t t ) 1 q ≤ p ′ ( ∫ 0 ∞ ( t 1 p f ( t ) ) q d t t ) 1 q (2.2). for non-negative measurable functions f, for which the integral on the right-hand side in (2.2) is finite.
Explicit expressions can be found for a number of interesting cases for which these integrals can be evaluated in closed form.
The class of measurable ⪯-preserving functions generates a binary relation on P, denoted by ⪯ g, as follows: given P, Q ∈ P, then P ⪯ g Q when ∫ f d P ≤ ∫ f d Q. for all measurable ⪯-preserving functions f for which both integrals exist.
In order to approximate the Riemann-Stieltjes integral ∫ a b p ( t ) d v ( t ), where p, v : [ a, b ] → R are functions for which the above integral exists, Dragomir established in [18] the following integral identity: (1.1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com