Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
A subsequent pregnancy for which CVS was normal resulted in a healthy sister.
Coefficients of variations (CVs) based on repeated analyses of a standard reference material (SRM 1589; N = 15) ranged from 3.9%to18.5%5%, except for PCB 105 and p, p'-DDT, for which CVs were 31.6% and 26.2%, respectively.
Similar(58)
If it was a gas for which Cv was not three-halves R, all of this would still be true.
Values within brackets (concerning SP concentration, SOL) are the mean values if samples for which CV was above 15% were excluded (CV was above 15% concerning values for in total 3 samples out of the 42 samples analyzed).
Based on statistical analysis of the four sampling periods for which CV-1 assays were conducted on multiple occasions (A, B, F, G), androgenic activity from the discharge samples but not from the upstream and downstream sites was significantly elevated.
Most scientists are familiar with the rules for constructing a CV; after all, we come from an environment in which CVs are the norm.
Average CVs within batch ranged from 5% for DHEAS to 14% for SHBG, with the exception of progesterone for which the CV was 17% in one batch (CVs for progesterone 7 to 15% in remaining batches).
A single dominant QTL for branching was observed on linkage group 1, for which the CV allele had a positive effect.
λ was subsequently calculated in hearts for which both CV and AERP values were available (0 and 1 μ m flecainide).
The actin genes, twelve from human and ten from chimpanzee, have available array data in all the five tissues (see Table S6), for which the average CVs of expression level values were 0.584 and 0.527 of human and chimpanzee, respectively.
To do a fair comparison between selection methods using AIC and ρ-GP-CV, we first describe AIC for years 2009 and 2010, for which ρ-GP-CV were also available and then, as additional information, for year 2012, for which ρ-GP-CV was not available since the marker information was missing.> -wrap-foot> Table shows ΔAIC relative to the best model.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com