Sentence examples for for violating the principles from inspiring English sources

Those claims are obviously designed to encourage operators to the program, to help them convert customers into data users and smartphones, but Internet.org has attracted plenty of criticism for violating the principles of net neutrality.

In contrast to the challenges that Facebook faces in India, where its Free Basics service has been banned for violating the principles of net neutrality, Uber has taken a more conciliatory approach.

In contrast to the challenges that Facebook faces in India, where its Free Basics service has been banned for violating the principles of net neutrality, Uber has taken a more conciliatory approach.

He also published An Appeal to the Public on the Subject of the Riots in Birmingham (1791), which indicted the people of Birmingham for allowing the riots to occur and for "violating the principles of English government".

And last but not least: thanks to a court decision in March -- a decision that resulted directly from the F.C.C.'s effort to punish one big Internet service provider, Comcast, for violating the principle of net neutrality -- the agency's very authority to regulate broadband is in doubt.

When one includes this understanding of the economic context that dictates individual access to health care, context itself seems like a grossly unfair justification for violating the principle of beneficence.

The offspring might be blamed by third parties for violating the principle of filial piety, the doctors might be accused of malpractice or murder, and supporters might be criticized for being anti-humanitarian or violating the principle of saving the dying [ 5, 14].

For the charge of violating the principle of the equality of cause and effect that he leveled against Cartesians spoke at least equally well against the laws of the TMA and the HPN.

As a result, many architects and critics faulted him for violating the rigid principles of orthodox Modernism, for each time adopting a different "style for the job".

As a result, many architects and critics faulted him for violating the rigid principles of orthodox Modernism, for each time adopting a different "style for the job". So there's a delightful irony to seeing his retrospective in buildings designed by two canon-approved modernists.

Put simply, given that shrinking the federal district and introducing new states are legal in accordance with the Constitution, current D.C. statehood legislation can be passed and implemented without constitutional amendments or the potential for violating the foundational principles of U.S. law.