Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
BoW (bag of words) is one of the most popular methods for video representation.
As Fig. 7 shows, we compare our proposed spatio-temporal video representation with other BoW-based extensions for video representation.
Similar(58)
In Table 1, generalized dimensions D0 (the fractal dimension), D1 (the information dimension), and D2 (the correlation dimension) for 3D video representation formats are given.
Numerical results for characteristic points of the spectrum - fmax, α fmax), αmin, and αmax, by the method of moments, for 3D video representation formats are given in Table 1.
For a video representation, since the number of low-level features varies depending on the length of a video, GMM supervector which is derived based on maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation is expected to be effective and be robust to such variation.
These values mean that the mostly present fractal dimension is approximately equally probable for all 3D video representation formats.
Previous studies of transport characterization of 3D videos are often dedicated to analysis of protocols for delivering 3D video representation formats [11 13].
The quantity of data for the multiview video representation format is significantly higher than in the case of the conventional single-view video and presents a restriction on storage and transmission of the video.
Multifractal spectra obtained by the histogram method for isolated frame types: only I frames, only P frames, and only B frames for different 3D video representation formats are presented in Figure 9.
A comparison of multifractal properties by multifractal spectra for different 3D video representation formats shows the highest burstiness in the case of CV of the multiview video, followed by the SBS 3D video representation format, while the FS format has the lowest level of burstiness.
Kaelig Deloumeau-Prigent, Mario Andrade, Duncan Hammond have worked on a great new potential video representation for Guardian content.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com