Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Figure 4 shows anecdotal evidence for two proteins, each consisting of 3 distinct domains.
Similar(59)
The letters H and N stand for two proteins on the outside of all Type A viruses.
Two proteins each for IleRS (orf19.2138 and orf19.2382) and LeuRS (orf19.2560 and 5705) were predicted to have anti-codon binding domain at the C-terminal of catalytic domain.
The complex consists of five proteins, each required for male viability (MSL1, MSL2, MSL3, MLE, and MOF), together with two redundant non-coding RNAs: roX1 and roX2.
Park and Levitt [12] used a highly simplified model to generate decoy sets of 35,000 to 200,000 decoy structures each for eight proteins.
For each of the three proteins, we obtained the intensity values [binding ratio (log2) and P value] of more than 40000 probes that covered the entire yeast genome and constructed binding profiles for three proteins (Supplementary Figure S1).
For seven proteins multiple peptides were tested.
For all these four proteins, each Tudor domain appears to possess pockets that may potentially recognize post-translation modifications on a single substrate, though multivalent interaction of tandem Tudor domains in this structural arrangement has yet to be demonstrated.
Consequently, analyses of animal EST databases reveal that RP appeared to have only one type of mRNA; the exceptions are rare, for example, in the channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) EST analysis has revealed, except for three protein types, that each other RP type is encoded by only one type of mRNA [ 44, 45].
Figure 1 shows a schematic: translation determines a series of amino acid sequences {.., Seqt−1, Seqt, Seqt+1,.} = {Seqt}t∈Z, each Seqt for one protein chain, ordered by a discrete temporal order t∈Z of corresponding tertiary structures {.., Strt−1, Strt, Strt+1,.} = {Strt}t∈Z, where Z = {..,−1, 0, 1,.} is the set of integers.
We calculated BALF/serum level ratios of the two proteins for each patient, and compared the ratios of two diseases.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com