The employed classification method allowed for a precise temporal localization of the features that contributed to the performance of the classifier for three modalities.
For three modalities, i.e., susceptible peppers, cultivation of F1 (DH330 × DLL) and mixture of resistant peppers carrying Me1 or Me3, no protection effect on lettuce was observed after three cultivation cycles.
Participants could then endorse whether or not and to what extent this applied on a five-point Likert scale (1 5; no, mild, medium, strong and extreme) for five modalities (visual, auditory, tactile (touch), somatic (i.e., bodily sensations), olfactory (smell) and other).
These trials compared the diagnostic accuracy of two modalities for breast cancer detection.
In order to support the comparisons made by visual inspection, we computed the correlations, within individuals, between the cortical current distributions obtained for the two modalities, for baseline and main task-related activity, in all frequency bands.
Local tumor control, complications related to treatment, and long-term survival (4-year survival 37% for MWA versus 24% for RFA, P = 0.12) were equivalent for the two modalities [91].
Comparative sensitivity values for extra-hepatic disease range from 58 to 74% for CT, vs. 90 100% for FDG-PET, whilst specificity values are similar for the two modalities[ 17 ].
The reversal of the DF1 scores for the two modalities (i.e. positive DF1 lesion scores for DRS and negative DF1 scores for colorimetry) has no physical significance and is purely a computational artifact.
Two retrospective studies have reported a high sensitivity for CTA and MRA in this setting, which is comparable for the two modalities [ 14, 15].
