Figure 8 Comparative diagram of E SCB for two methods calculated for each frame.
Thus we computed the CW phase variations for two methods of the PM series filtering and two methods of the CW phase evaluation.
Average male and female relatedness were negative for two method-of-moment regression estimators (Figure 1), but negative relatedness values are not unexpected given the high sampling variance of these estimators inherent in all but the largest data sets [60], [e.g. >40 loci, 63].
There are two p-values for two methods compared.
In this work, stereo-acuity was measured for two methods: (1) monovision and (2) small aperture inlay in one eye.
Among the M. pneumoniae cases, three were culture positive, 86 were PCR positive, and 43 demonstrated positive serological results (27 cases were positive for two methods).
Using the two methods collaboratively would allow for one method to compensate for the limitations of the other [7].
For one method we constructed a promoter-probe library by fusing ΔSterne genomic fragments to a promoterless GFP gene.
Were this not so, it would not be possible for one method to have an advantage over the other.
Some business models are not even possible for one method versus the other.
(See "zig-zag" section of Do Peyote Stitch for one method of finishing off cord, which is the same method for adding new cord).
