Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Table 1 Weights for two choices for the contribution from each decomposition level (L = 4).
IPDA-ACF with the refined adaptation scheme has been simulated for two choices of l (IPDA-ACF l, with l=1 corresponding to the classical PDA filter, and l=2 to the target-existence-based IPDA filter), together with the IPDA-ICF algorithm (both choices of l have produced very similar results so that only the case l=1 has been considered).
To verify this, we calculated the absolute distribution from NP = 31609 PDB chains for two choices, 5.7Å and 9Å, of the geometrical distance threshold r which defines a contact pair if any two Cα atoms of the backbone are closer than r (Fig. 2A).
We then considered the scope distances of reactions from nutrient metabolites for two choices of reaction sets.
We tested the performance of both MEN and BBSR on these PKI sets with increasing error for two choices of the respective weight parameters as follows.
Similar(55)
We presented 50 stimuli to the circuit and repeated the encoding for eight choices of σ.
It appears that test makers intuitively get the proportions right for three choices but have trouble doing so when there are more than three.
This was repeated for five choices of sample sizes.
Three Pearson's correlations are 0.934, 0.947, and 0.932 for three choices of γ.
The comparison has been made by computing different quantiles for six choices of MAFs.
To determine a sensible value for p12, we compared the prior and posterior relative probabilities for H4|H3 or H4 for three choices of p12: 10−6, 10−6 and 10−5 (Fig. 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com