Here Mr. Carsen has opted for two approaches, one more successful than the other.
The partial longitudinal study design allowed for assessment of stability for two approaches.
See (Fine 2009) and (Schaffer 2009) for two approaches along these lines.
Table 1 Energy and utility for two approaches with MP4 penalty and VLOW load Approach Energy (KWh) Utility value LT-DTD 70.2 0.79 NOM 91 0.88.
Subsequently, regression calibration and simulation extrapolation were conducted on this same parsimonious model, as alternative methods for two approaches (A and B) described earlier.
Figure 2 compares the performance of the unique classifiers on the testing set for two approaches: 1 – using only labeled samples 2 – using labeled plus unlabeled samples.
We give various empirical data for ten approaches from the third LWC.
Two GPR buried object detection situation samples are given in Figures 10 and 11 for five approaches.
Blocking Time with Varying Database Sizes In Fig. 10, we compare the blocking time for three approaches with different dataset sizes.
We further furnish the confusion matrices for four approaches: STIP, STIP+BSIF-TOP, iDT, and iDT+BSIF-TOP on the SD 3 videos in Fig. 7.
