Suggestions(1)
Exact(10)
* Note: Means within each group were adjusted for total calories.
For baseline nutritional exposures derived from the FFQ (total carbohydrate and leucine), models were additionally adjusted for total calories.
The average for total calories obtained was about 29 kcal/kg, while the average protein intake approached 1.2 g/kg.
Descriptive statistics included geometric mean nutrient intake (given the skewness in nutrient distributions) adjusted for total calories.
Potential confounding effects were investigated for total calories, sex, body-mass index (BMI), cigarette smoking, race, education, history of diabetes, physical activity, and other food groups.
Geometric means of the total daily antioxidants and other nutrients consumed adjusted for total calories among all cases are shown in Table 2.
Similar(50)
Low total dietary fiber (lowest quartile ≤20 g/day) was associated with increased risk of diabetes after adjustment for total calorie intake and potential confounders (relative risk −1.47 [95% CI 1.03 2.11]).
Along these lines, daily consumption of fruits and vegetables has been inversely associated, independently of adjustments for total calorie intake and body mass, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [ 7, 8].
A significant intervention effect was evident for improvement in dietary quality, for reduction of total calories and percentage of fat of total calories (P < 0.01) at 4 and 12 months, and for reduction of percentage of saturated fat of total calories at 12 months (P = 0.04) (Table 2).
Among those who ate the least of these foods, added sugar accounted for 7.5% of total calories; among those who ate the most ultra-processed foods, added sugars made up 19.5% of total calories.
In this subgroup, label reading behavior was assessed for use of total calories, calories from fat, total fat content, trans fat content, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, carbohydrates, fiber and sugars in making a product selection (10 questions).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com