Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
for those opposable
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "for those opposable" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to individuals with opposable thumbs or similar characteristics, but without additional context, it is unclear when to use it. Example: "The tools were designed specifically for those opposable, allowing for better grip and control."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Wiki
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Watch out for those opposable thumbs.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
In your phone's selfie mode put those opposable thumbs to work by trying to press the button while simultaneously throwing the phone in the air and then clapping.
News & Media
If it weren't for the opposable thumb, we would all be living in caves".
News & Media
We humans might think we're superior for having opposable thumbs and four fingers on each hand, but researchers at MIT have figured out a new way to go one well, two better.
News & Media
In the same way that environmental forces once selected for our opposable thumbs, upright posture, and the development of language and tools, they are now pushing us not to flee the planet, but to evolve a totally new worldview and value set like the one Taoists discovered millennia ago.
News & Media
The only requirements for use are opposable thumbs.
News & Media
All the fingers have pointed claws, as do the toes except for the large opposable flat-nailed great toes.
Encyclopedias
Smart people try and tell you that what makes us so successful as a species is thumbs, those nifty opposable digits that let us grip tools and make stuff.
News & Media
An informant for Opposable Thumbs has the inside scoop that the 80GB model will drop down to the somewhat acceptable price of $500.
News & Media
As for those rumblings?
News & Media
Pray for those injured.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When referring to individuals with opposable thumbs, use the more explicit phrase "for those with opposable thumbs" to ensure clarity. This avoids any ambiguity regarding who or what the phrase is describing.
Common error
Avoid using the phrase "for those opposable" without specifying what it refers to. This can lead to confusion and misinterpretation. Instead, clarify the noun being modified, such as "tools for those with opposable thumbs".
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "for those opposable" functions as a prepositional phrase, though grammatically incomplete. As Ludwig AI points out, it's not correct and lacks clarity. Its intended function is likely to describe a group or purpose related to beings or objects possessing opposable thumbs.
Frequent in
News & Media
30%
Encyclopedias
30%
Wiki
10%
Less common in
Science
10%
Formal & Business
10%
Social Media
10%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "for those opposable" is grammatically questionable and lacks clarity in common usage. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is not considered correct. While it appears in various sources, particularly news and encyclopedias, more precise alternatives like "for those with opposable thumbs" are highly recommended. This ensures that the intended meaning is accurately conveyed, especially in professional or formal contexts. Therefore, exercise caution and prioritize clarity in your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
for those with opposable thumbs
Replaces the adjective "opposable" with a prepositional phrase for clarity.
for individuals with opposable thumbs
Specifies "individuals" to whom the opposable thumbs belong, enhancing precision.
for users with opposable thumbs
Focuses on the 'users' and clarifies the intended population.
concerning those with opposable thumbs
Uses "concerning" to indicate the topic is about those with opposable thumbs.
regarding those with opposable thumbs
Similar to "concerning", providing a formal alternative.
for handling with opposable thumbs
Changes the focus to the action being done with the opposable thumbs.
designed for opposable thumbs
Highlights the design aspect related to opposable thumbs.
suitable for opposable thumbs
Indicates appropriateness or fitness for use with opposable thumbs.
intended for opposable thumbs
Emphasizes the intended purpose or target group.
appropriate for those able to grasp
Shifts focus to the grasping ability afforded by opposable thumbs.
FAQs
How can I correctly refer to individuals with opposable thumbs?
Instead of using the ambiguous phrase "for those opposable", it's better to use clearer alternatives like "for those with opposable thumbs" or "for individuals with opposable thumbs" to avoid confusion.
What does "for those opposable" mean?
The phrase "for those opposable" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't have a clear meaning. It likely intends to refer to individuals or tools designed for those with opposable thumbs but lacks clarity.
Is "for those opposable" grammatically correct?
No, "for those opposable" is not grammatically correct. A more appropriate phrasing would be "for those with opposable thumbs" to properly indicate possession or characteristics.
What's the difference between "for those opposable" and "for those with opposable thumbs"?
The phrase "for those with opposable thumbs" is grammatically sound and clearly refers to people or things possessing opposable thumbs. "For those opposable" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't convey a clear meaning. It needs the "with" to clarify the relationship.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested