Each of the faces presents each of those expressions for the five different poses: frontal face, looking up, left, right, and looking down.
To understand the regulation mechanism that is responsible for the tissue-specific expression patterns, we scanned the DNA sequence alignments of the putative promoter regions, exon 1 sequences and intron 1 sequences for those expression-pattern-linked nucleotides.
We set cutoff values for those expression ratios (CEA/GAPDH, CK-7/GAPDH, CK-19/GAPDH, uPAR/GAPDH) as the highest value for each marker in 25 normal controls.
These data indicate that these genes may share some common regulatory elements for those expression patterns, further suggesting that genetic linkage between these two genes has been under an evolutionary constraint.
This successful class prediction was the rationale for including those expression profiles in our predictive models.
Genes of which adjusted-P-value or false discovery below 0.05 were collected and further selected for those gene expressions were higher than 1 or less than -1 at least at one stage compared to that at stage 1.
Results failed to demonstrate an EC effect specific to the analogue phobic group, although both groups showed an evaluative shift toward disgust for those facial expressions paired with BII-relevant pictures.
That is, the SSH/microarray assays detected 10-fold more differentially expressed genes, particularly for those low-expression genes, than did the conventional cDNA microarray.
For hormone responses, those expression data were based on Agilent 44 K arrays (GSE39429) (NCBI GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi acc=GSE39429, accessed on November 21, 2015) (Sato et al. 2013).
