Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Seven articles met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review.
Out of 7122 articles identified, 41 met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review.
Once all predefined criteria had been met, 35 articles were included for this systematic review.
The PRISMA 2009 checklist was applied for this systematic review.
As a result, meta-analysis was not possible for this systematic review.
This protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; CRD42015029169).
In total, seven studies were considered eligible for this systematic review.
The literature search yielded 13 publications, but we identified 2 manuscripts available for this systematic review.
The protocol for this systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO (Registration No: CRD42015020056).
We did not publish or register a protocol for this systematic review.
Finally, we identified 2 manuscripts available for this systematic review (Rihmer et al. 2015; Pompili et al. 2017) (Fig. 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com