I've got a lot of sympathy for this interpretation.
"The author of the statute has said there is no basis for this interpretation.
The reason for this interpretation of the employment discrimination laws is obvious.
There's a revisionist argument for this interpretation, but it doesn't tally with the descriptions of Vivie in the text.
We find several alternatives for this interpretation of f log |f|.
The rationale for this interpretation was twofold: First, a contrary interpretation would impermissibly extend the Copyright Act extraterritorially.
For this interpretation to work fully, though, "Boys" needs a consistently better-cast ensemble than this one.
Further support for this interpretation has been obtained from an ice core drilled in Greenland covering 430 years.
There could be an intellectual argument made for this interpretation, especially given that Jessie speaks about how people never really know one other.
Some support for this interpretation comes in the form of Trump's evident disdain for the proper boundaries between a president and his Justice Department.
The District Court interpreted Mass.Gen.Laws, c. 264, § 15, which punishes a '(v iolation of section fourteen,' see n. 1, supra, as 'presumably' punishing 'a failure to 'live up' to the oath.' We see no basis for this interpretation.
