There are two excellent reasons for this inconsistency.
This research examines one possible explanation for this inconsistency.
Demographic characteristics of subjects such as educational major may be a reason for this inconsistency.
One cause for this inconsistency may lie in the regional characteristics of the Tohoku district.
The factors like setting and methodological differences, clinical and socio-cultural factors might be responsible for this inconsistency.
Note that for a policy inconsistency, there might be several policy sets that are responsible for this inconsistency.
One potential explanation for this inconsistency explored in the current study involves the manner in which these programs were implemented.
One possible reason for this inconsistency could be the density contrast between the anti-continent and the normal upper mantle (harzburgite).
It is difficult to determine the exact reason for this inconsistency; however, one plausible reason is the sensitivity of the PPR.
The reasons for this inconsistency are typically complicated, and may be due to cultivar, environment, tissue stage and/or method sensitivity (Ma et al. 2011).
In any case, further case studies using visible light cameras and/or other sensors, including weather radar, will be needed to understand the reasons for this inconsistency.
