Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The FST estimates used for this comparison were based on the average racial divergence in eight microsatellite loci as published by Steane et al. (2006) (FST = 0.09).
Similar(59)
Identification for this comparison was based on the unique pseudonym.
This comparison was based on heuristics.
However, this comparison was based on a less rigorous analysis (pairwise indirect comparisons) – without testing for bias or heterogeneity.
The second design we assess for comparison is based on Bayesian isotonic regression transformation (BIT) [ 23].
P-values for treatment comparisons were based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
For continuous variables, comparisons were based on the nonparametric Mann-Whitney two-sample test.
For continuous variables, comparisons were based on the non parametric Mann-Whitney two-sample test.
Adjustments for multiple test comparisons were based on univariate and multivariate permutation test.
The comparison is based on a 12-track CD equivalency for song downloads.
The comparison is based on attributes selected from the Minimal Data Model for Cardiology (MDMC).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com