Exact(34)
Experiment 2 directly contrasted correct answer tasks with personal judgment tasks, using the same foils for the two tasks.
The recognition results for the two applications are shown to compare favourably with other techniques designed specifically for the two tasks.
Table 9 in Appendix 2 sums up participants' strategy use for the two tasks with information about strategy description, category (to which it belonged), source (where it came from) and frequency counts (the number of times a certain strategy occurred).
An ANCOVA with a repeated measures factor for the two tasks with IQ as the covariate found that ASD group scored significantly lower on both emotion and non-emotion facial processing tasks.
Although this feature did not receive much attention, there were some cases that explained the reasons for learners' liking or disliking for the two tasks: Like: < It was interesting to make a story and say what has happened in the story >.
The pattern of results was nevertheless very similar for the two tasks.
Similar(26)
Participating teams could submit up to five runs for each of the two tasks.
Table 1 shows two example team predictions for each of the two tasks.
There were 16 variables four element scores for each of the two tasks delivered via each of the two modes.
Training was provided for each of the two tasks (matching or magnitude/ratio production, as applicable).
For each of the three tasks rating scales provided raters with benchmarks for each grade [see additional file 1].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com