Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Otherwise, similar results for the two groups were found at the subsequent assessment periods (P > 0.05), as shown in Table 2.
Similar(59)
No significant differences between the two groups were found for oestrone, 17-β oestradiol, DHEA-S, and progesterone levels.
Significant differences between the two groups were found for both functional ROM.
No significant differences between the two groups were found for mortality.
Significant differences between the two groups were found for all subscales.> -wrap-foot> Note.
For internalizing problems and self-reported offending, no significant differences between the two groups were found.
No significant difference between the two groups was found for enhancement kinetics (P = 0.667).
For node status and histological grade, no significant difference between the two groups was found.
No significant differences among the four groups were found.
Similar differences for two groups were found for females also, though there were no significant differences in hemoglobin levels and physical activity between the two groups.
Thirteen groups were found to have some kind of criteria implemented for assay acceptance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com