Looking at the Syrian case, this article argues that the AKP's humanitarianism in Turkey is merely a continuation of the selectiveness that these governments also pursued.
Concern is often expressed at the low response rates for cohort studies, or the selectiveness of the group under study, and the generalisability of their results [ 17].
This restriction was adopted because if the threshold p is too small, the selectiveness for any method gets bad – as one should expect – as does the running time, in particular for EXCELLENT.
For low values of d, the selectiveness of GOOD* and EXCELLENT* is 0 (and indeed does not even appear in the figure because of the log scale).
As expected, one observes that the selectiveness results are better for EXCELLENT than for GOOD, which themselves are better than for FINE.
Only for the case d = 14 and q = 6, where the selectiveness was bad (even for EXCELLENT* with 85%), the selectiveness improvement was smaller than the observed slowdown (13% against 54%).
Some tests for Human Chromosome 22 with parameters (L, d, r) = (260,13,280) and q ranging from 14 down to 9. The selectiveness improvement of EXCELLENT compensates for its slowdown over GOOD for q < 12.
The country dummies are also a robustness check for whether the results are biased by variance in the selectiveness of the different national newspapers, such as could be expected for Austria.
Using EXCELLENT rather than GOOD, for the cases with large errors (d/ L ≥ 10%) and not too small threshold p (p/ L ≥ 25%), the selectiveness improvement is of 69%, for a running time only 20.5% larger.
