for the second week in row

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for the second week in row" is not correct.
It should be "for the second week in a row." You can use it when referring to an event or situation that has occurred consecutively for two weeks. Example: "The team has won the championship for the second week in a row."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Crude oil futures extended losses after plunging 3percentt on Friday, pressured by the stronger dollar and data showing the U.S. oil drilling rig count rose for the second week in row.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

This past week the estimated grosses dipped below $1 million for the second week in a row.

The New York Times

TECH For the second week in a row, a fan fell over a railing in Bobby Dodd Stadium.

The New York Times

For the second week in a row, there is major news on gay rights.

The New York Times

She tried to have Claudia for breakfast – for the second week in a row.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

For the second week in a row, union and management clashed over discussing matters in public.

The New York Times - Sports

The N.F.L. named him the conference offensive player of the week for the second week in a row.

The New York Times - Sports

If Vick cannot start, Doug Johnson will get the assignment for the second week in a row.

The New York Times - Sports

But, for the second week in a row, she was not a factor on championship Sunday.

The New York Times - Sports

For the second week in a row it was Gareth Bale who rescued them.

The Guardian - Sport

Pat Perez found himself in the middle of all the action for the second week in a row.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct idiom: "for the second week in a row". This ensures clarity and grammatical accuracy in your writing.

Common error

Avoid omitting the article "a" in the phrase. The correct form is "for the second week in a row", not "for the second week in row".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for the second week in row" functions as an adverbial phrase intending to modify a verb by indicating the duration or frequency of an action. However, as Ludwig indicates, it's grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "for the second week in a row."

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for the second week in row" is grammatically incorrect. The correct idiom is "for the second week in a row". As Ludwig points out, the missing article "a" constitutes the error. Although the intended meaning is clear—to express that something has occurred in two consecutive weeks—it's crucial to use the correct phrasing to maintain grammatical accuracy. Consider using alternatives such as "for the second consecutive week" or "for two weeks running" for clarity and precision. Despite appearing in various sources, including news outlets, adhering to the correct grammatical form is essential for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for the second consecutive week

Uses "consecutive" to emphasize the uninterrupted sequence of weeks.

two weeks in succession

Highlights the sequential nature of the weeks.

for two weeks running

Employs "running" to indicate successive occurrences.

for the second week straight

More informal; 'straight' emphasizes the continuous nature.

for the past two weeks

Focuses on the time period leading up to the present.

in the last two weeks

Specifies a timeframe, similar to 'for the past two weeks'.

over the last couple of weeks

Uses less formal language, with "couple" instead of "two".

during the previous two weeks

Formal and emphasizes the 'previous' nature of the weeks.

again this week, as last week

Explicitly states the recurrence from the previous week.

following the trend from last week

Implies that something is continuing similarly from last week.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "for the second week in row"?

The correct way to express this idea is "for the second week "in a row"". The inclusion of the article "a" is crucial for grammatical correctness.

Is it acceptable to say "for the second week in row" in informal conversation?

While it might be understood, it's generally best to avoid saying "for the second week in row" even in informal settings, as it's grammatically incorrect. Instead, opt for "for the second week "in a row"".

What are some alternatives to saying "for the second week in a row"?

Alternatives include "for the second consecutive week", "for two weeks running", or "for the past two weeks".

What's the difference between "for the second week in row" and "for the second week "in a row""?

The phrase "for the second week in row" is grammatically incorrect due to the missing article "a". The correct phrase is "for the second week "in a row"".