Exact(49)
(for the case p < 0, we assume that f > 0 ).
A counterexample for the case p = 1 is given for the case of real interpolation.
A geometrical proof of that K ε → K0 was presented in [4] for the case p = ∞.
Meanwhile, for the case p = 1, we have the following theorem.
For the case p = 2, we cite [2 12], and references therein.
For the case p = 0, we obtain the classical Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative operator.
Similar(10)
end{aligned} (2.21) For the case (p=1) or (i=0), the subscript p or i in (Lambda _{p,i}) will often be suppressed.
Some conditions similar to ((f_{2})) were also introduced in [3] for the case (p=2) and in [4] for the case (p>1).
In addition, for the case (p=1), we have the following result.
For the case (p<0), we assume that (x=x t)neq0) for all (tin Y).
The argument for the case (p=1) is simpler in the same way.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com