Similar as for the fluence both methods result within the stochastic nature of the Monte Carlo simulations in the same radiance.
Since peak detection is used for the estimation of the IIB-phase for both methods, the frequency resolution and MLW contribute to the estimation accuracy.
The minimal errors were 0.36 Gy for the odontoid LM and 0.33 Gy for the sternum LM, for both methods.
We combined the both methods for generating the maps in our system.
We restricted investigations here, achieved in the same laboratory, to be for the same patients for both methods.
Counts and positions of major CO events remained the same for both methods, although the sensitivities of the two methods seemed to vary for small COs.
Comparing the haplotyping results for both methods, the same haplotypes were found in 85% (11/13) except for amplicons F5/S2 in samples NA12760 and NA18502 (Table 1).
Table 1 reports the timings of the simulations for both methods.
It was found that the results for both methods used for determination of fT>MIC were comparable.
The beginning is the same for both methods.
