Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
for tests against
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "for tests against" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to conducting tests to evaluate or measure something in relation to a specific standard or against a particular criterion. Example: "The software was developed for tests against various security vulnerabilities to ensure its robustness."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
They return home for Tests against West Indies and South Africa in the summer.
News & Media
Moreover, this extract showed higher antibacterial activity for tests against S. aureus ATCC 33591, ATCC 33592, SA3 and SA5 strains (128 256 μg/ml) than oxacillin (512 μg/ml).
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
The solution of 5 mg/mL of compound in DMSO was prepared for testing against bacteria.
Science
Structures from the SDFile with unknown activity that end up in clusters that contain structures with known activity have a high probability to show the same biological effects, thus are potential candidates for testing against this activity.
Science
The most reactive overlapping peptide pool was then used to amplify specific CTL for testing against peptide-loaded autologous resting Tregs and resting non-Tregs (see methods).
Science
Streptomycin sulphate and gentamicin sulphate were used as positive control for testing against S. aureus and E. coli, respectively.
The studentized Breusch-Pagan test was performed for testing against heteroscedasticity and the Shapiro-Wilk test was used for testing the normality of the residuals.
Science
In this study, we sought to find an effective chemotherapeutic treatment against arthropod gregarines (Apicomplexa), and to identify candidate compounds for testing against other groups of protozoan parasites.
Our primary goal is to find an effective chemotherapeutic treatment against arthropod gregarines, and identify candidate compounds for testing against other related groups of apicomplexan parasites.
For testing against monkey kidney cell lines (LLCMK2) 1:10 serial dilutions of the E. hirta stock solutions were prepared down to 1 μg/ml.
This makes it possible to compare SARMs across different targets and identify compounds that are attractive candidates for testing against additional targets.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "for tests against", ensure the subject being tested and the standard it's being tested against are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "for tests against" without specifying the type of tests or the criteria. This can lead to vagueness and reduce the impact of your statement. Be specific about the methodology and benchmarks.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "for tests against" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase indicating the purpose or objective of conducting tests. It specifies what the tests are intended to evaluate or measure something in relation to. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "for tests against" is used to specify the purpose of conducting tests in relation to a particular standard or criterion. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and usable in written English. It's most frequently found in scientific and news media contexts. The key is to ensure clarity by specifying both the subject being tested and the benchmarks used. Alternatives include phrases such as "in order to test against" or "designed to test against". Though grammatically correct, "for tests against" should be used with precision to avoid vagueness.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
in order to test against
Adds an element of purpose or intention to the testing activity.
designed to test against
Highlights the design aspect, implying that something was specifically created for testing.
intended for trials against
Replaces "tests" with "trials", suggesting a more experimental or investigative approach.
used in assays against
Specifies the type of tests being conducted, indicating a scientific or analytical context.
for evaluations of against
Replaces the word "tests" with "evaluations" which can add a layer of formality
to conduct testing against
Emphasizes the act of performing the tests, rather than the tests themselves.
for assessments relative to
Shifts the focus to a comparative evaluation, using "relative to" instead of "against".
in susceptibility tests against
Specifies the type of test, indicating a test that measures vulnerability
for assays aimed at
Changes "against" to "aimed at" to clarify the intent or purpose of the testing.
for efficacy testing on
Focuses on how effective a product is when tests are executed on it.
FAQs
How can I use "for tests against" in a sentence?
You can use "for tests against" to describe the purpose of an experiment or evaluation. For instance, "The software was designed for tests against common cybersecurity threats".
What's a more formal alternative to "for tests against"?
Alternatives include phrases like "for evaluations relative to" or "for assessments regarding", which can lend a more professional tone.
Is it correct to say "for test against" instead of "for tests against"?
While "for test against" might be grammatically understandable, "for tests against" is more common and grammatically correct, especially when referring to multiple evaluations or trials.
What's the difference between "for tests against" and "for testing of"?
"For tests against" specifies what something is being evaluated in relation to, while "for testing of" refers to the process of evaluating something, without necessarily specifying a direct comparison.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested