Moreover, the content of a cognitive process underlying a particular item was not found to influence the content of that cognitive process for the subsequent item.
Additionally, differences found in the content of a cognitive process for one item was not found to influence dissimilarity in the content of that same cognitive process for the subsequent item.
Additionally, dissimilarity was unrelated to the questionnaire item, and dissimilarity of the preceding item, i.e. differences found in the content of a cognitive process for one item was not found to influence dissimilarity in the content of that same cognitive process for the subsequent item.
This is important information for two reasons: firstly, subsequent item and test development can be informed by targeting new items at the location of the gaps, and secondly, these gaps indicate regions in which there is minimal information about candidate skills.
For subsequent analysis, items and responses were collapsed to create the dichotomous variable of: 'friends had not tried smoking (friends do not smoke and have not tried smoking; scored 0) or 'friends smoke' (friends smoke or had tried smoking; scored 1).
An information specialist can establish the potential significance of any subsequent items identified for the review through tangible markers such as numbers of citations and the presence of co-citation.
For START strengths, the significant items for subsequent discharge were higher scores on item 2 'relationships', item 3 'occupational', item 6 'mental state', item 10 'external triggers', item 17 'insight', item 18 'plans', item 19 'coping' and item 20 'treatability' (Tables 7 and 8).
Non-adaptive factors were used more often in the first item than subsequent items.
