Suggestions(2)
Exact(6)
They reported no association when focusing on "ever smoking", "starting smoking > 35 years ago", "high dose or long duration", but interestingly they detected an inverse association for "starting smoking < 35 years ago" [ 11], and "first starting smoking after age 25" [ 10].
§§ The combination of never smoked and starting smoking <40 years ago, was used as reference category for "starting smoking ≥ 40 years ago".
Many factors have been reported as being responsible for starting smoking during school age, but it is still not well known which cognitive determinants may be used as predictive factors of tobacco use.
The age for starting smoking was asked (average 13.2 years).
For CRC cases divided based on APC truncation mutation status all the smoking characteristics, exept for "starting smoking ≥ 40 years ago", yielded a higher odds ratio for APC - tumors compared to APC + tumors (see Table 5).
Linear regression analysis showed that, after controlling for reasons for starting smoking, age at initiation was significantly earlier among Swedish women (β -0.72, p = 0.02) than among French women, and significantly later among women from the Czech Republic (β 1.79, p < 0.0001) (Table 6).
Similar(53)
For the event of starting smoking, the follow-up time for censored observation is the age when interviewed during the survey.
We investigated the association between depression and smoking status, smoking exposure, duration of smoking cessation, and age of starting smoking while controlling for socioeconomic factors.
Two variables were found to be important indicators for smoking, one was age of starting smoking, and the other was cigarettes per day.
Crude odds ratios and corresponding adjusted odds ratios by controlling age, gender and alcohol drinking history for cigarette smoking history, age of starting smoking, smoking years and cumulative pack-years were calculated respectively.
The multivariate-adjusted model of age of starting smoking among current-smokers was additionally adjusted for th4e amount of smoking.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com