Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(37)
Magazine readers no longer have to squint to see the health warning on ads for smokeless tobacco products.
Even though the environmentally conscious are opting for smokeless firecrackers, can we ever have a firecracker-free Diwali?
Kentucky and Tennessee are the nation's second- and third-largest tobacco producers, after North Carolina, and the leading producers of the leaves used for smokeless tobacco.
Over the same two decades, tobacco companies more than quadrupled advertising and promotional spending for smokeless products, to $354 million, from $77 million.
The company constructed a facility near Nashville, Tennessee, for smokeless powder production that became the largest such factory in the world.
The new rules requiring more prominent health warnings on advertising for smokeless tobacco products officially go into effect June 22 and kick in a year later for cigarette ads.
Similar(22)
I also gave it up for my health: smokeless tobacco causes oral cancer, mouth lesions, gum disease and tooth decay; it has been linked to heart attacks and pancreatic cancer.
# Prevalence for smoked and smokeless tobacco use is not mutually exclusive.
Altria Group said Monday in a statement that it had reached an agreement to buy UST, the maker of Skoal and Copenhagen smokeless tobacco, for about $10.2 billion.
Separate sets of meta-analyses were carried out for chewing tobacco, for snuff and for overall smokeless tobacco use (both from studies where only estimates for unspecified use were available and from studies where the estimate was derived from the separate data for chewing tobacco and snuff).
The results of the overall (USA and Nordic countries combined) meta-analyses are summarized in Table 1, and show a statistically significant increase of 60 80% for ever smokeless tobacco use for oral, oesophageal and pancreatic cancer, and a non-significant 20% increase for lung cancer.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com