for simple

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for simple" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express simplicity or ease, but it lacks context and clarity. Example: "This solution is designed for simple understanding."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"The people were for simple and just.

The New York Times

It is rather for simple aesthetic consistency.

The Economist

Yet Klein settles for simple, overt answers.

The New York Times - Books

Sometimes, too, Israelis look for simple answers.

The New York Times

Sometimes it's for simple cheating.

The Guardian - Sport

The need for simple messages.

The New York Times

And worried for simple reasons.

Harvard University

Surely there's no legislating for simple politeness?

The Guardian - Travel

All to play for; simple as that.

The Guardian - Sport

Again, the bikes are for simple journeys.

The Guardian

This is no time for simple retreat.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "for simple" in formal writing. Instead, use phrases like "for simplicity", "for the sake of simplicity", or "to keep it simple" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Don't assume that "simple" can directly follow "for" as if it were an adjective describing the reason or purpose. "For" requires a noun or gerund phrase to function correctly in this context. Prefer "for simplicity" or rephrase to include a verb like "to simplify".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for simple" functions as a prepositional phrase, though grammatically flawed. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase requires a noun or noun phrase as its object, which "simple", as an adjective, does not fulfill. It often aims to express purpose or reason, but does so incorrectly.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Academia

16%

Wiki

13%

Less common in

Science

13%

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "for simple" appears frequently across various sources, including news, academic, and wiki contexts, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The preposition "for" requires a noun or noun phrase, whereas "simple" is an adjective. To rectify this, use phrases like "for simplicity", "to keep it simple", or "for ease of use". Although common, prioritizing grammatical correctness is crucial for formal writing to ensure clarity and precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for the sake of simplicity

Adds a rationale, explicitly stating simplicity as the goal.

to keep it simple

Emphasizes maintaining simplicity as a guiding principle.

in the interest of simplicity

Highlights simplicity as a beneficial factor.

for ease of use

Focuses on the user-friendliness aspect of simplicity.

for the purpose of simplifying

Clearly indicates an action aimed at making something simpler.

for uncomplicated

Replaces "simple" with a synonym, maintaining a similar meaning.

for rudimentary

Suggests a basic or fundamental level of simplicity.

to make it basic

Focuses on reducing something to its most essential elements.

for elementary

Implies a foundational or introductory level of simplicity.

for plain

Emphasizes the straightforward and unadorned nature.

FAQs

What's grammatically wrong with the phrase "for simple"?

The phrase "for simple" is grammatically incorrect because "for" is a preposition that requires a noun or noun phrase as its object. "Simple" is an adjective, not a noun. To correct this, you could use "for simplicity".

How can I use "simple" correctly with the preposition "for"?

You can use "simple" correctly with "for" by rephrasing the sentence to include a noun form or by using a different preposition altogether. For example, use "for simplicity" or "to keep it simple".

Are there alternatives to "for simple" that maintain a similar meaning?

Yes, several alternatives can convey a similar meaning with better grammatical correctness. Some options include "for simplicity", "for ease of use", or "to keep it simple".

When is it acceptable to use "for simple", if ever?

While "for simple" appears in various sources, it's generally not considered grammatically correct in formal writing. It might be acceptable in very informal contexts or where brevity is prioritized over strict grammar, but it's best to opt for clearer alternatives like "for simplicity" in most situations.