Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(41)
F-ratios and probabilities are reported for significant results and results approaching significance, whereas F-ratios alone are presented for other comparisons.
These p-values are all less than 0.05, as required by convention for significant results.
But recent successes in treating autism have also shown that in many cases, the earlier the detection and intervention of a disorder, the greater chance for significant results.
Positive and negative predictive values were calculated for significant results.
Signs # for significant results comparing R and NR.
The measured change has to be bigger than the error produced by the measurements, or in other words, one must choose the survey parameters based on the rate of change of the landslide compared to the field survey frequency for significant results.
Similar(19)
For the significant results, adjusting for educational attainment and self-reported general health in HUSK only minimally changed the estimates (data not shown).
The rate of full publication of meeting abstracts ranged from 37%to81%1% for statistically significant results, and from 22%to70%0% for non-significant results.
There seems to be, in addition to the bias shown for abstract acceptance, a significant preference for statistically significant results influencing abstract submission.
False-positive report probabilities (FPRPs) for the significant results (P < 0.05) were calculated to account for potential false positives.
Therefore, a q-value threshold for false discovery rate was chosen empirically to include enough genes for statistically significant results.
More suggestions(15)
for noticeable results
for significant achievement
for significant performance
for significant variations
for significant concessions
for full results
for significant failures
for significant abatements
for optimal results
for concrete results
for perfect results
for minimal results
for significant sums
for complete results
for significant parks
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com