Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Open image in new window Fig. 6 Test setup for shear tests of cast-in anchors in plastic hinge zone.
Similar(59)
Fig. 1 Samples for shear test; a samples measures, b sample cut, c sample area sanded, d adhesive area marked with pen.
The adequate specimens are: (a) WBS-4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 for tensile test; (b) WBS-5, 6 and 8 for shear test, and (c) WBS-5 and 8 for flexural test.
Another important finding was that the loading at the short side showed higher bond strength compared with the loading at the long side for shear test methods (P < 0.05).
The test setup for the shear tests is similar.
From dissected mandibles transverse sections of the mesial root of the first molar were obtained at the apical and coronal levels and used for dynamic shear tests.
According to Disfani et al. [16] the specimens for direct shear tests were compacted in three layers inside the shear box using a rubber-tipped tamping rod following wet compaction method (partially saturated).
However, strengths at failure of Mat32 type are in good agreement with Hashin's failure criterion, for pure shear tests up to 30° loading angles.
Park and Song (2009, 2013) carried out an extensive series of simulations for direct shear tests of rock joints using PFC3D to demonstrate the feasibility of reproducing a rock joint using the bonded particle model and examine the effect of the geometrical features and the micro-properties of a joint on its shear behaviour.
Numerical simulations for monotonic shear tests were conducted to demonstrate the capacity of the proposed model in predicting the stress strain relationship of elastomeric bearings at different strain rates.
Geotechnical practice in the Austrian Alps determined that it is difficult to evaluate the shear strength properties of clay-rich fault gouge associated with thin shear zones because of a lack of undisturbed samples and the high normal stresses required for appropriate shear tests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com